TF写作真题第076套(rs001)

TF写作真题第076套(rs001)-托您的福
TF写作真题第076套(rs001)
此内容为付费阅读,请付费后查看
10
限时特惠
19
您当前未登录!建议登陆后购买,可保存购买订单
付费阅读

Directions:

You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.

 

题目原文:

 

In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.

 

The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring morestaff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits.

 

For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.

 

Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.

 

题目音频:

写作真题第076套(rs001)

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI3ODM5NzI3Mg==&mid=2247504448&idx=1&sn=aa116c73eba62e114477e69ebdfba501&chksm=eb553a77dc22b36115d69871d46ecc81ab8a5d262f09f79222a5a03ae79f0c8eb975534f63eb&scene=21#wechat_redirect

 

学术写作:

简化大意:

教授:大超市和小店哪个优点更多?大超市的便利会比小店的个性化更重要吗?

Claire: 大超市更好。

Andrew:小店更好。

 

详细题目回忆: 

Doctor Achebe:

Let’s explore the concept of retail and its variations. In the world of retail, there’s a unique type where a wide array of products are housed under one roof, allowing for wholesale purchases. This brings us to the idea of super stores. On the other end, we have small stores catering to specific needs. Now, considering these options, which one do you think holds more advantages for people? Would the convenience of super stores outweigh the personal touch of small stores?

 

Claire:

In my opinion, super stores hold an edge over small stores due to their wide-ranging product choices, extended hours, and cost-saving options. As a student juggling classes and activities, the convenience of finding everything under one roof and the potential for bulk discounts make superstores a practical choice. While small stores offer a personal touch, the efficiency and budget-friendly nature of super stores align better with my busy college lifestyle.

 

Andrew:

In my view, small stores outweigh super stores, mainly due to the emphasis on personalized service and repairs. The direct assistance and expertise offered by small stores are invaluable, especially when it comes to electronics or gadgets that might need fixing. While super stores provide convenience, the hands-on support and tailored solutions from small stores align better with my college experience and budget considerations.

 

答案请付费后查阅:

 

© 版权声明
THE END
喜欢就支持一下吧
点赞8.9W+
分享
评论 抢沙发
tuonindefu的头像-托您的福

昵称

取消
昵称表情代码图片